Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

HUGH THOMAS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals an order denying his motion for correction of sentence under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We reverse the order because, although referring to the record of the proceedings, the trial court failed to attach the pertinent information upon which it relied to deny the motion and without such attachments, we are precluded from conducting meaningful review. See Corp v. State, 698 So.2d 1349 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997).

Accordingly, we reverse and remand either for attachment of those portions of the record that conclusively show that appellant is not entitled to relief, or for further proceedings.

REVERSED AND REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.

MICKLE and DAVIS, JJ., and MCDONALD, PARKER L., Senior Judge, CONCUR.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

THOMAS v. STATE
(Mar 31, 1998)