AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

In the Matter of ANDREW KULAKOWICH, Respondent, v. ALICE ZINGARELLI, Formerly Known as ALICE Z. KULAKOWICH, Respondent, and ANNE GILLEECE, as Law Guardian, Appellant.

Ordered that the order is reversed, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, without costs or disbursements, and the petition is denied.

A petition for a modification of custody should only be granted when the totality of circumstances warrants modification in the best interest of the child ( see, Eschbach v. Eschbach, 56 N.Y.2d 167). The custodial parent is given priority in order to maintain and promote the stability in the child's life ( see, Matter of Maute v. Maute, 228 A.D.2d 444; Matter of Lobo v. Muttee, 196 A.D.2d 585, 587).

The determination of the Family Court is not supported by the record before us. Custody of this child was awarded to the mother in 1991 pursuant to the parents' agreement. Since that time, the child has resided with his mother. The child, who is now 15 years old, has indicated a clear and strong desire to remain with his mother. In light of the long-term custodial arrangement, the mother's fitness to care for the child, the need for stability in the child's life, and his expressed desire to remain living with his mother, it is appropriate for the mother to continue as the custodial parent.

We note that although both parents love and care for their son, the ultimate resolution of their child's difficulties will only occur if both parents commit themselves to amicably work together towards his emotional and intellectual development.

Miller, J.P., Sullivan, Pizzuto and Friedmann, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Matter of KULAKOWICH v. ZINGARELLI
(Apr 6, 1998)