Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The hearing court correctly denied that branch of the defendant's motion which was to suppress the complainant's in-court identification. The photo array from which the complainant made a pretrial identification was not impermissibly suggestive ( see, People v. Robert, 184 A.D.2d 597; Matter of Christopher E., 163 A.D.2d 385).
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution ( see, People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence ( see, CPL 470.15).
The defendant's remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit.
Rosenblatt, J.P., Ritter, Sullivan and Goldstein, JJ., concur.