Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.
The plaintiffs' motion, denominated as one for renewal and reargument of their prior motion for leave to serve a further bill of particulars, was not based upon new facts which were unavailable at the time they submitted their original motion for leave to serve a further bill of particulars ( see, Bossio v. Fiorillo, 222 A.D.2d 476). Therefore, the motion is really for reargument, and an order denying such a motion is not appealable.
Rosenblatt, J.P., Sullivan, Joy, Altman and Luciano, JJ.,