Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, the People's failure to preserve and disclose a photograph taken of him after his arrest does not require reversal under the circumstances of this case ( see, People v. Wallace, 76 N.Y.2d 953; People v. Kelly, 62 N.Y.2d 516; People v. Rodriguez, 210 A.D.2d 266; People v. Kelly, 194 A.D.2d 693; CPL 240.20; 240.70 [1]).
The defendant's remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, without merit.
Bracken, J.P., O'Brien, Santucci and Altman, JJ., concur.