Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting her of grand larceny in the fourth degree (Penal Law § 155.30), petit larceny (Penal Law § 155.25), criminal impersonation in the second degree (Penal Law § 190.25) and six counts of criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree (Penal Law § 170.25). By failing to object to the admission of the videotape of the conditional examination of two prosecution witnesses, defendant did not preserve for our review any of her contentions concerning the validity of the conditional examination and the admissibility of the videotape (see, CPL 470.05; People v. Dixon, 221 A.D.2d 952, lv denied 87 N.Y.2d 972, cert denied 519 U.S. 842). Supreme Court properly denied defendant's motion for a mistrial after a prosecution witness referred to defendant's commission of an uncharged crime (see, People v. Guise, 179 A.D.2d 1027, lv denied 79 N.Y.2d 1001; People v. Nagi, 153 A.D.2d 964). Defendant failed to preserve for our review her contention that the court's questioning of the jurors and the court's curative instruction were inadequate (see, CPL 470.05; People v. Santiago, 52 N.Y.2d 865, 866).