Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

ROBERT EARL WILEY, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Robert Earl Wiley, appeals the denial of his 3.850 motion for postconviction relief. We agree with the trial court's ruling that State v. Gray, 654 So.2d 552 (Fla. 1995), does not apply retroactively to invalidate this defendant's conviction.See State v. Woodley, 695 So.2d 297 (Fla. 1997). The trial court also ruled that State v. Iacavone, 660 So.2d 1371 (Fla. 1995), should not be applied retroactively to invalidate the sentence imposed on Wiley. The Florida Supreme Court has now ruled that Iacavone is to be retroactively applied. State v. Stevens, 23 Fla. L. Weekly S166 (Fla. March 26, 1998). The trial court ruled in the alternative that Iacavone is not relevant to this appellant's sentence. However, we cannot determine from the attachments to the order denying postconviction relief whether that determination is accurate. The documents attached were from the sentence originally imposed in 1992 and not the sentence imposed after this court's reversal and remand in 1994. See Wiley v. State, 636 So.2d 547 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). Accordingly, we reverse and remand for reconsideration. If the trial court again concludes that the Iacavone decision is not relevant to this case, the pertinent portions of the record should be attached to the order.

MICKLE, LAWRENCE and DAVIS, JJ., CONCUR.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WILEY v. STATE
(May 13, 1998)