Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
Contrary to the father's contention, the Family Court did not err in determining on this record that the father failed to adduce adequate medical and financial evidence to establish an unanticipated and unreasonable change in circumstances warranting a downward modification of his child support obligation ( see, e.g., Cymes v. Cymes, 235 A.D.2d 312; Matter of Lada v. Lada, 231 A.D.2d 521; Cheryl R. v. Laurence R., 223 A.D.2d 484; Matter of Sturgeon v. Sturgeon, 110 A.D.2d 1013).
The father's remaining contentions are either without merit ( see, Matter of Lada v. Lada, supra) or are based on material which is dehors the record and which may not be considered on this appeal.
Miller, J.P., Ritter, Sullivan and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.