Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The Family Court properly found that the appellant had engaged in a course of conduct which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted harassment in the first degree (see, Penal Law § 240.25; People v. Wood, 59 N.Y.2d 811; People v. Payton, 161 Misc.2d 170; People v. Tralli, 88 Misc.2d 117). Accordingly, the order of disposition is affirmed.
Rosenblatt, J.P., Miller, Thompson and Santucci, JJ., concur.