AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

JAMES M. KAPLAN, Appellant, et al., Plaintiff, v. INTERNATIONAL PAINT (U.S.A.), INC., et al., Respondents.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the appellants contention, the court properly admitted evidence of the lack of prior similar accidents ( see, Wagner v. Chance Co., 231 A.D.2d 566; Goldberg v. Union Hardware Co., 162 A.D.2d 658). In addition, the court properly precluded the appellant from using certain medical articles to impeach Dr. Richard Stewart on cross examination since Dr. Stewart refused to admit to the authoritativeness of the articles ( see. Walsh v. Staten Is. Obstetrics Gynecology Assocs., 193 A.D.2d 672, 673).

The appellants remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit.

Miller, J.P., Ritter, Sullivan and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

KAPLAN v. INTERNATIONAL PAINT (U.S.A.)
(May 26, 1998)