Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

SCOTT LOUIS BRUNSCHWIG and COSTA NURSERY FARMS, INC., Appellants, vs. HOWARD SIMPSON, Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The trial court abused its discretion in denying the motion to dismiss on forum non conveniens grounds filed by defendants Scot Louis Brunschwig and Costa Nursery Farms, Inc. Howard Simpson, a Virginia resident, filed a negligence action in Florida to recover damages for injuries suffered when defendant Brunschwig, a Florida resident, drove his rental car into Simpson crushing Simpson's right leg. At the time, Brunschwig was an employee of Costa, a Florida corporation. The accident occurred in Virginia, Simpson received medical care in Virginia, and the witnesses, other than defendants, are in the Virginia area. Virginia is clearly an adequate alternate forum, and the balancing of both private and public interests requires dismissal; the absence of a statutory settlement procedure in Virginia does not tip the scale in favor of Florida. See Kinney Sys., Inc. v. Continental Ins. Co., 674 So.2d 86 (Fla. 1996); Resorts Int'l, Inc. v. Spinola, 705 So.2d 629 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998); Ryder Truck Rental, Inc. v. Rosenberger, 699 So.2d 713 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997), review denied, 705 So.2d 570 (Fla. 1998); Burger King Corp. v. Koeppel, 564 So.2d 209 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990). We, therefore, reverse the order and remand for further proceedings. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.061.

Reversed and remanded.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BRUNSCHWIG v. SIMPSON
(Jun 3, 1998)