PER CURIAM.
Jerome Hart appeals his conviction for burglary of an unoccupied conveyance and the order of restitution. We find no trial error and affirm the conviction.
Defendant-appellant contends that the evidence is insufficient to support the $500 restitution order. This claim is not properly preserved for appellate review, because it was not presented in the first instance in the trial court. See § 924.051(3), Fla. Stat. (Supp. 1996). Loring v. State, 674 So.2d 165, 168 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); Gliszczynski v. State, 654 So.2d 579, 580 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); Bayer v. State, 597 So.2d 870, 871-72 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992).
Affirmed.