AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

In the Matter of KALEB U., a Child Alleged to be Neglected. BROOME COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, Respondent; DAVID U., Respondent; CYNTHIA V., Appellant.

Respondent Cynthia V. (hereinafter respondent) is the mother of Kaleb U., who was adjudicated a neglected child following a fact-finding hearing. Family Court thereafter placed Kaleb in petitioner's custody for a period of 12 months. On this appeal by respondent, her counsel asserts that there are no nonfrivolous issues to be raised on appeal. Upon our review of the record and the brief submitted by respondent's counsel, we agree.

Although there was a finding of neglect against. Kaleb's father as well, only respondent is appealing.

The record demonstrates that Kaleb was born with Pierre Robin's syndrome, a cleft palate and a central nervous system disorder, causing him to be susceptible to, among other things, choking and requiring that he be placed on an apnea monitor in order to regulate his breathing. Quick and effective response to the monitor's alarm is critical. In addition, Kaleb also requires a feeding tube which his caregiver must insert. A review of the record clearly demonstrates that respondent fails to fully comprehend the severity of Kaleb's medical condition, due in part to her limited intellect, and is unable to adequately provide for and respond to his special needs. In addition, the record reveals that respondent's two healthy children have previously been adjudicated neglected and remain in foster care. In view of the foregoing, we affirm Family Court's order finding of neglect and relieve respondent's counsel of her assignment ( see, e.g., Matter of William EE., 245 A.D.2d 813; see also, People v. Cruwys, 113 A.D.2d 979, lv denied 67 N.Y.2d 650).

Mercure, Crew III, Yesawich Jr. and Peters, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF KALEB U
(Jun 25, 1998)