AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MICHAEL PERRY, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant failed to preserve for our review his contention that his guilty plea was not knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently made ( see, People v. Ferguson, 192 A.D.2d 800, lv denied 82 N.Y.2d 717). Defendant failed to object to the enhanced sentence or to seek to withdraw his plea or vacate the judgment of conviction based upon the imposition of the sentence. Thus, defendant's contentions concerning the enhanced sentence are not preserved for our review ( see, CPL 470.05; People v. Ramirez, 210 A.D.2d 56, lv denied 84 N.Y.2d 1037). We decline to exercise our power to address those contentions as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice ( see, CPL 470.15 [a]). The sentence is neither unduly harsh nor severe.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. PERRY
(Jul 8, 1998)