Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant was convicted of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree after cocaine was seized from his person during a traffic stop. On appeal, he argues that the court erred in denying suppression of the physical evidence.
The defendant's argument that the traffic stop was pretextual was not raised before the hearing court and is, therefore, not properly before this Court on appeal (see, People v. Lebrun, 234 A.D.2d 392). In any event, the stop was not pretextual, but was, rather, permissible based upon the officers' observation of a violation of the Vehicle and Traffic Law (a broken license plate light) (see, People v. Jackson, 241 A.D.2d 557; People v. McCoy, 239 A.D.2d 437; Whren v. United States, 517 U.S. 806).
Further, the defendant's argument that he was ordered out of his vehicle, rather than that he voluntarily exited the vehicle in order to scrutinize his license plate light, raised an issue of credibility that was resolved against him by the hearing court. We find no basis to disturb the hearing court's determination (see, People v. Prochilo, 41 N.Y.2d 759). In any event, assuming, arguendo, that the defendant was ordered out of the vehicle by the officers, on the facts presented, such an order would have been permissible. Accordingly, the hearing court properly denied that branch of the defendant's omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence (see, People v. Robinson, 74 N.Y.2d 773, cert denied 493 U.S. 966; People v. Ingle, 36 N.Y.2d 413; People v. Jackson, supra).
Ritter, J. P., Santucci, Joy and Florio, JJ., concur.