Petitioner, a prison inmate, challenges the determination finding him guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules that prohibit inmates from damaging and tampering with State property, refusing a direct order and not complying with safety regulations. Petitioner contends, inter alia, that he was denied the right to have a Spanish interpreter at his hearing. The record, however, reveals that petitioner told the Hearing Officer that he understood the charges against him, did not need an assistant and made no request for an interpreter. Our review of the record establishes that petitioner did not need the services of a translator as he was sufficiently fluent in English to understand and knowledgeably participate in the disciplinary hearing ( see, Matter of Robles v. Coombe, 238 A.D.2d 628; Matter of Perez v. McClellan, 197 A.D.2d 812). Moreover, the testimony of petitioner's civilian machinery supervisor, combined with the detailed misbehavior report as well as petitioner's own testimony, constitutes substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt ( see, Matter of McMillian v. Goord, 252 A.D.2d 646; Matter of Moncrieffe v. Bennett, 251 A.D.2d 925).
We note that when petitioner did request an interpreter to translate the misbehavior report and the Hearing Officer's decision and disposition, one was provided.
Petitioner's remaining contentions have been reviewed and found to be lacking in merit.
Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Yesawich Jr., Peters and Spain, JJ., concur.
Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.