The motion court properly granted the motion for disqualification based on a conflict of interest. Counsel to defendant Mendon Leasing, the lessor of the truck involved in the accident in which the infant plaintiff was injured, had in a separate action relating to the same accident previously represented John Densby, the driver of the truck involved in the accident. Since Mendon's interests in the litigation arising from the accident are in material respects adverse to those of counsel's former client, Densby, it is clear that counsel may not represent Mendon ( see, Code of Professional Responsibility DR 5-108 [A] [1] [ 22 NYCRR 1200.27 (a) (1)]; Tekni-Plex, Inc. v. Meyner Landis, 89 N.Y.2d 123). Having disqualified counsel on the basis of such conflict, the court's directive that there be an in camera inspection of the files to be turned over to succeeding counsel was entirely appropriate as a means of shielding from disclosure the privileged communications of the disqualified firm's prior client ( see, Spectrum Sys. Intl. v. Chemical Bank, 78 N.Y.2d 371).
Concur — Tom, J. P., Mazzarelli, Andrias and Saxe, JJ.