AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

KIMBERLY WALKER et al., Respondents, v. BERRY HUBER, Appellant.

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint in this personal injury action. Kimberly Walker (plaintiff), a home health aide, alleged that she fell in the bathroom of defendant's home as the result of defendant's negligence. Defendant sought summary judgment on the ground that plaintiff was a special employee whose claim is barred by Workers' Compensation Law § 11 ( see, O'Rourke v. Long, 41 N.Y.2d 219). Defendant met her initial burden of establishing her entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, having averred that defendant exclusively directed and controlled plaintiff's work duties ( see, Thompson v. Grumman Aerospace Corp., 78 N.Y.2d 553, 557-558). Plaintiff raised an issue of fact, however, concerning her characterization as a special employee by submitting proof that her duties and responsibilities were governed by the healthcare plan and that defendant could not instruct her to deviate from it ( see, Ozzimo v. H.E.S., Inc., 249 A.D.2d 912).

The argument of defendant that she is entitled to summary judgment on the ground that plaintiff was injured as the result of a dangerous condition that plaintiff had undertaken to correct is raised for the first time on appeal and is not properly before us.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WALKER v. HUBER
(Oct 2, 1998)