AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

CANDICE G. ADAMY, Indi v. dually and as Administratrix of the Estate of JOSEPH P. ADAMY, Deceased, Respondent,

Judgment unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Defendant T.G.I. Friday's, Inc., contends that Supreme Court erred in granting plaintiff's motion seeking a lump sum payment of the periodic installments on the annuity for future damages that accrued from the date of the verdict (October 7, 1994). There is no merit to that contention. The trial court has discretion to order an immediate lump sum award to be deducted from any annuity awarded ( see, Williams v. Bright, 230 A.D.2d 548, 557, appeal dismissed 90 N.Y.2d 935). We also reject the contention that an immediate lump sum award represents a windfall for plaintiff and thus violates the statutory scheme of CPLR articles 50-A and 50-B ( see, Rohring v. City of Niagara Falls, 84 N.Y.2d 60, 69-70).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ADAMY v. ZIRIAKUS
(Oct 2, 1998)