AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

ELIZABETH ROMAN et al., Appellants, v. EDWARD E. KONIS et al., Respondents.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

The plaintiffs' motion, denominated as one for renewal and reargument, was, in effect, a motion to reargue, since the purportedly new material could have been submitted in support of the original motion to restore the case to the trial calendar ( see, Taylor v. Brooklyn Hosp., 187 A.D.2d 714, 715; Echeverri v. Flushing Hosp. Med. Ctr., 123 A.D.2d 818, 819). Consequently, the order denying the motion is not appealable ( see, Ackermann v. Town of Riverhead, 245 A.D.2d 404; Castellitto v. Atlantic Pac. Co., 244 A.D.2d 379; Guigui v. Bonnie Castle Resort, 239 A.D.2d 315).

Miller, J. P., Thompson, Pizzuto, McGinity and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ROMAN v. KONIS
(Oct 5, 1998)