Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action to recover for personal injuries he sustained when defendant, his girlfriend, backed over him with her van. Plaintiff appeals from a judgment assessing costs and disbursements against him and dismissing the complaint based on a jury verdict finding that defendant was not negligent (appeal No. 1). Plaintiff also appeals from a subsequent order denying his motion to set aside the verdict as contrary to the weight of the evidence (appeal No. 2).
Supreme Court properly denied the motion to set aside the verdict. A verdict should not be set aside as contrary to the weight of the evidence unless it is palpably wrong or irrational ( see, Stangl v. Compass Transp., 221 A.D.2d 909), i.e., unless the evidence so preponderates in favor of the moving party that the verdict could not have been reached upon any fair interpretation of the evidence ( see, Lolik v. Big V Supermarkets, 86 N.Y.2d 744, 746), or unless the verdict is not one that reasonable persons could have rendered after receiving conflicting evidence ( see, Greene v. Frontier Cent. School Dist., 214 A.D.2d 947, 948).
This is not a case in which it can be said that the verdict is palpably wrong or irrational. Given the conflicting testimony, the jury reasonably could determine that defendant was not negligent ( see, El-Houayek v. Hertz Penske Truck Leasing Corp., 233 A.D.2d 478, 479; Shachnow v. Myers, 229 A.D.2d 432, 433; Briccio v. Disbrow, 212 A.D.2d 565, 566; Waugh v. Johns, 206 A.D.2d 525, 526-527).