Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed.
The conditions of the defendant's probation included abstention from drug use as well as participation in and completion of a drug rehabilitation program. Contrary to the defendant's contention, the evidence at the hearing was sufficient to establish that he violated his probation since proof was adduced that he failed to complete the rehabilitation program. The violation was further established by the defendant's admission of drug use to his probation officer, who testified to this admission at the hearing ( see, People v. Stoliker, 94 A.D.2d 854, 856).
The defendant's sentence was not excessive ( see, People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80).
Bracken, J. P., Copertino, Santucci, Florio and McGinity, JJ., concur.