AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

WILLIAM TROVATO et al., Appellants, v. AIR EXPRESS INTERNATIONAL, Respondent.

Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiffs were fired for misconduct. They brought this action alleging that they were wrongfully terminated due to false sexual harassment charges which were brought against them. Upon the defendant making out a prima facie case for summary judgment, the trial court granted its motion for that relief, concluding that the plaintiffs failed to present any evidence, other than speculation, to support their allegations. We affirm.

The plaintiffs' conclusory allegations are insufficient to raise an issue of fact sufficient to deny the summary judgment motion ( see, Bracie v. Yeshiva Univ., 88 A.D.2d 823). There is no support for the plaintiffs' contentions that they were fired for discriminatory reasons.

The plaintiffs' remaining contentions are without merit.

Rosenblatt, J. P., Miller, Goldstein and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

TROVATO v. AIR EXPRESS INTERNATIONAL
(Oct 13, 1998)