The record reflects that appellant consented to the placement set forth in the dispositional order. Since no appeal lies from an order entered on consent ( Matter of Michael CC., 216 A.D.2d 740), this appeal is dismissed. Were we to address the merits, we would find that the court properly exercised its discretion in placing appellant in a limited secure setting, based upon the Probation Department reports, evaluations submitted by examining psychologists, and appellant's history of difficulties in various schools previously attended ( Matter of Jason L., 246 A.D.2d 444).
Concur — Lerner, P.J., Sullivan, Rosenberger, Ellerin and Rubin, JJ.