The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There was ample evidence to establish that defendant, after shoplifting two compact discs from the store, engaged in pushing, fighting, kicking and wrestling in an effort to defeat the security guards' efforts to recover the property, such as to constitute the use of physical force for the purpose of "[p]reventing or overcoming resistance * * * to the retention [of the property] immediately after the taking" (Penal Law § 160.00). Given that defendant was in possession of the stolen property while he was engaged in such use of force, the jury was entitled to infer that his purpose in using force was to retain control of the stolen property, not merely to escape or defend himself ( People v. Thomas [Williams], 226 A.D.2d 120, lv denied 88 N.Y.2d 886, 887).
We perceive no abuse of sentencing discretion.
Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Rubin, Tom and Mazzarelli, JJ.