The affidavit of plaintiff's officer, together with the supporting documentation, competently established the issuance of the policy to defendants and the amount of premium owed ( see, Family Coatings v. Michigan Mut. Ins. Co., 170 A.D.2d 816). Defendants' claim that a broker fraudulently induced them into switching policies was properly rejected by Appellate Term on the ground that there was no evidence that the broker was acting as plaintiff's agent ( cf, Incorporated Vil. of Pleasantville v. Calvert Ins. Co., 204 A.D.2d 689). Further disclosure cannot avail defendants.
Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Nardelli, Mazzarelli, Andrias and Saxe, JJ.