Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.
The defendant established prima facie entitlement to summary judgment by submitting evidence demonstrating that the plaintiff did not sustain a "serious injury" ( see, Insurance Law § 5102 [d]). In order to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether he suffered a "significant limitation of use of a body function or system" (Insurance Law § 5102 [d]), as alleged, the plaintiff was required to submit objective evidence of the extent or degree of the limitation and its duration ( see, Beckett v. Conte, 176 A.D.2d 774). The affidavit of the plaintiff's physician failed to provide such evidence in that it relied on unsworn reports ( see, Merisca v. Alford, 243 A.D.2d 613; Friedman v. U-Haul Truck Rental, 216 A.D.2d 266).
Bracken, J. P., Ritter, Copertino, Santucci and Altman, JJ., concur.