The record supports the court's finding that the stop of the livery cab in which defendant was a passenger was justified by the officer's reasonable interpretation of the cab driver's driving without lights, at night, in a high crime area, as a distress signal and request for police assistance ( see, People v. Damaceno, 214 A.D.2d 464, lv denied 86 N.Y.2d 734; People v. Hampton, 197 A.D.2d 365, lv denied 82 N.Y.2d 925). Moreover, the officer was justified in opening the back door of the cab as a security measure ( see, People v. Damaceno, supra). The record also supports the court's determination that the officer raised his hands to signal defendant to stop when defendant started to exit the cab and moved straight toward the officer immediately after the officer opened the door, and that the resultant accidental feeling of a hard object in the shape of a firearm was not a seizure ( see, People v. Moore, 202 A.D.2d 348, lv denied 84 N.Y.2d 870; compare, People v. Sanchez, 38 N.Y.2d 72). We find no reason to upset the court's credibility determinations ( see, People v. Prochilo, 41 N.Y.2d 759, 761).
Concur — Milonas, J. P., Rosenberger, Williams, Tom and Saxe, JJ.