AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. SHANE P. LYNCH, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed and matter remitted to Herkimer County Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: In view of defendant's criminal record, we conclude that the sentence of incarceration imposed by County Court is not unduly harsh or severe ( see, CPL 470.15 [b]). We further conclude, however, that the court erred in determining the amount of restitution without conducting a hearing. The court properly considered the victim impact statement in making its "finding as to the dollar amount of the fruits of the offense" (Penal Law § 60.27). That statement alone, however, did not provide "a sufficient basis upon which to order restitution without a hearing" ( People v. Ashley, 162 A.D.2d 883, 885, lv denied 76 N.Y.2d 852; see, People v. Barnett, 237 A.D.2d 917, 918, lv denied 90 N.Y.2d 855; People v. Monette, 199 A.D.2d 589). We therefore modify the judgment by vacating the amount of restitution, and, we remit the matter to Herkimer County Court to determine the amount of restitution.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. LYNCH
(Nov 13, 1998)