The judgment of the court of appeals on Propositions of Law Nos. I and II is affirmed on the authority of State v. Cook (1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 404, 700 N.E.2d 570.
Propositions of Law Nos. III, IV, and V are dismissed as having been improvidently allowed.
DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.
MOYER, C.J., and COOK, J., concur in part and dissent in part.
COOK, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part.
I dissent from the dismissal of Propositions of Law Nos. III, IV, and V.
MOYER, C.J., concurs in the foregoing opinion.