APPEAL ERROR — CERTIFICATION OF CASE TO SUPREME COURT — CERTIFICATION GRANTED. —
Where the supreme court determined that certification was proper on the issue of whether a motion to extend the time for filing the record was properly granted because determination of this issue involves the interpretation and application of Ark. R.App. P. — Civ. 5 and could result in dismissal of the appeal as requested by several of the appellants, the supreme court accepted certification from the court of appeals on this question only.
PER CURIAM.
On October 23, 1998, the court of appeals certified this matter to this court because it found that the case presented a question pertaining to interpretation of a rule. After reviewing the briefs filed by the parties, we have determined certification is proper on the issue of whether a motion to extend the time for filing the record was properly granted. Because determination of this issue involves the interpretation and application of Ark. R. App. P. — Civ. 5 and may result in dismissal of the appeal as requested by several of the appellants, we accept certification on this question only.