Defendant was not entitled to a hearing when he raised constitutional challenges to each of his two prior convictions. Defendant was precluded from contesting the use of his 1983 conviction as a predicate conviction since he had previously been adjudicated a second violent felony offender in 1988 based on that conviction and failed to seek review of that adjudication by direct appeal or appropriate post-judgment motion ( People v. Loughlin, 66 N.Y.2d 633, 635-636). Such preclusion resulted from operation of the applicable statutes (CPL 400.15; 400.16 [2]) and there was no requirement that the 1988 proceedings contain an express waiver of the right to challenge the 1983 conviction. With respect to the 1988 conviction, defendant was not entitled to a hearing on his claim that the plea resulted from "coercion" by counsel, since the alleged coercion consisted of nothing more than a warning of the risks of proceeding to trial ( see, People v. Spinks, 227 A.D.2d 310, lv denied 88 N.Y.2d 995).
Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Nardelli, Rubin and Mazzarelli, JJ.