Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

IN THE MATTER OF DAVID PAUL DANIELS, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board on October 27, 1998, having filed with the Court its decision concluding that DAVID PAUL DANIELS of CAMDEN, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1979, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.8 (a) (entering into an improper business transaction with a client), RPC 1.8 (e) (providing financial assistance to a client in connection with a pending or litigated matter), RPC 1.15 (a) (failure to safeguard client funds), and RPC 1.15 (d) (failure to comply with the recordkeeping requirements of Rule 1:21-6),

And the Disciplinary Review Board further having concluded that respondent should be required to practice under supervision for a period of two years and to submit to the Office of Attorney Ethics on a quarterly basis certified trust account reconciliations prepared by a certified- public accountant approved by the Office of Attorney Ethics for a period of two years;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that DAVID PAUL DANIELS is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent shall practice law under the supervision of a practicing attorney approved by the Office of Attorney Ethics, for a period of two years and until further Order of the Court; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent shall submit, on a schedule to be established by the Office of Attorney Ethics, certified quarterly trust account reconciliations prepared by a certified public accountant approved by the Office of Attorney Ethics, for a period of two years and until further Order of the Court; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file was an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Over-sight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN RE DANIELS
(Jan 29, 1999)