AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

NELSON COTTO et al., Respondents, v. HARRY COYLE et al., Appellants.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The court's determination that the injuries of the plaintiff Nelson Cotto were proximately caused by a defective sidewalk over which he tripped, and not by a pre-existing condition which caused his left knee to give out, is based upon a fair interpretation of the evidence. There is also ample support for the court's findings that the plaintiff did not contribute to the happening of the accident and that the defendants had constructive notice of the defect (see, Taylor v. New York City Tr. Auth., 48 N.Y.2d 903; Batton v. Elghanayan, 43 N.Y.2d 898, 899-900; Atkins v. Francesca Realty Assocs., 238 A.D.2d 457; Farrar v. Teicholz, 173 A.D.2d 674, 676).

The court's award of $210,000 for future pain and suffering did not materially deviate from what would be reasonable compensation (see, CPLR 5501 [c]; Atkins v. Francesca Realty Assocs., supra; Parros v. 1500 Realty Co., 226 A.D.2d 607; Urquhart v. New York City Tr. Auth., 221 A.D.2d 336; Serra v. City of New York, 215 A.D.2d 643; Lemberger v. City of New York, 211 A.D.2d 622; Castellano v. City of New York, 183 A.D.2d 800; Menga v. Raquet, 150 A.D.2d 434).

Sullivan, J. P., Santucci, Joy and Altman, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

COTTO v. COYLE
(Feb 16, 1999)