Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

CHEEK, RESPONDENT, v. INDUSTRIAL POWDER COATINGS, INC. ET AL PETITIONERS.

Pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. XVIII, the United States District Court certified the question of "Whether an individual employee, not otherwise deemed to be an `employer' under the statute, may be individually liable for alleged violations of the employment discrimination provisions of the Ohio Civil Rights Act, Ohio Rev. Code §§ 4112.01 (A)(2), 4112.02 (A) 4112.99?"

Our response is in the affirmative. See Genaro v. Cent. Transport, Inc. (1999), 84 Ohio St.3d 293, 703 N.E.2d 782.

MOYER C.J., DOUGLAS RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY PFEIFER and COOK, JJ., concur.

LUNDBERG STRATTON J., dissents.

LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissenting.

I disagree with the majority for the reasons set out in the dissenting opinions in Genaro v. Cent. Transport, Inc. (1999), 84 Ohio St.3d 293, 703 N.E.2d 782. I would hold that the General Assembly intended R.C. Chapter 4112 to impose liability only on employers, not on an employer's managers or supervisors. Therefore, I respectfully dissent.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CHEEK v. INDUS. POWDER COATINGS, INC
(Mar 10, 1999)