AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOSEPH GUZMAN, Appellant.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, and a new trial is ordered.

A trial court must allow counsel to hear the contents of a jury note and give counsel the opportunity to suggest responses to the note before the jury is returned to the courtroom ( see, People v. O'Rama, 78 N.Y.2d 270; People v. Heath, 234 A.D.2d 388). Here, as the People correctly concede, the trial court committed reversible error when it denied defense counsel's specific application that counsel be permitted to hear the contents of the notes prior to the jury being returned to the courtroom, and that counsel be permitted to participate in formulating responses to the notes ( see, People v. Cook, 85 N.Y.2d 928).

O'Brien, J. P., Ritter, Thompson and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. GUZMAN
(Mar 15, 1999)