Ordered that the appeal from the order dated October 14, 1997, is dismissed, as that order was superseded by the order dated April 17, 1998, made upon reargument; and it is further,
Ordered that the order dated April 17, 1998, is affirmed insofar as reviewed; and it is further,
Ordered that the respondents are awarded one bill of costs.
The plaintiff Arline Burstein was injured when she tripped on the edge of a terrazzo floor in the entryway of a store. The terrazzo floor was raised less than one inch above the abutting sidewalk. The Supreme Court properly determined that, as a matter of law, based on the dimensions and appearance of the alleged defect and the circumstances of the injury; the slight difference in elevation between the terrazzo floor and the sidewalk did not constitute a dangerous or defective condition ( see, Trincere v. County of Suffolk, 90 N.Y.2d 976). The condition was open and apparent and did not have any of the characteristics of a trap or nuisance ( see, Maloid v. New York State Elec. Gas Corp., 257 A.D.2d 712; Lopez v. New York City Hous. Auth., 245 A.D.2d 273; Guerrieri v. Summa, 193 A.D.2d 647).
The plaintiffs' remaining contentions are without merit.
O'Brien, J. P., Ritter, Thompson and Goldstein, JJ., concur.