AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Michael W. Schleeper, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Purina Benefits Association, a trust, Defendant-Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

In this ERISA case, the issue is whether the employee-beneficiary failed to exhaust his administrative remedies by not filing a timely intra-plan appeal. The District Court held the claim barred by failure to exhaust. We affirm.

The Hon. Stephen N. Limbaugh, United States District Court for the Eastern and Western Districts of Missouri.

Plaintiff argues exhaustion would have been futile. But no evidence to support this claim was adduced, and we are unwilling to assume futility. Plaintiff points out that he had already obtained one level of intra-plan review, and that his failure, if any, related only to a second level of intra-plan review. The law does not forbid an intra-plan appellate structure containing two levels.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SCHLEEPER v. PURINA BENEFITS ASSOCIATION
(Mar 24, 1999)