AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

GRATA TAN, Respondent, v. ABRAHAM G. T. TAN, Appellant.

Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof which directed the defendant to pay 70% of the child's future college expenses; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The trial court erred in directing the defendant to pay 70% of the child's future college expenses. At the time of trial, the child was 11 years old and was not attending college. There was no evidence as to his academic interest, ability, possible choice of college, or what his expenses might be. Consequently, the award for future college expenses was premature ( see, Matter of Whittaker v. Feldman, 113 A.D.2d 809, 811; see also, Matter of Walls v. Walls, 221 A.D.2d 925; LaBombardi v. LaBombardi, 220 A.D.2d 642; Friedman v. Friedman, 216 A.D.2d 204; Gilkes v. Gilkes, 150 A.D.2d 200).

The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.

Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

TAN v. TAN
(Apr 19, 1999)