Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

STEPHEN J. KLARICH, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

We grant rehearing, withdraw our original opinion and substitute the following in its place.

Appellant contends that certain special conditions of his probation order are illegal and thus should be set aside. However, appellant made no objection to these conditions at the trial level nor did he file a motion to amend the probation order. Thus, his contentions have not been preserved for appeal.See § 924.051(3), Fla. Stat. (1997); Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(d); Maddox v. State, 708 So.2d 617 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998), rev. granted, No. 92, 805 (Fla. July 7, 1998); Mason v. State, 698 So.2d 914 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). The errors complained of here do not appear to be fundamental in nature.

AFFIRMED.

GRIFFIN, C.J., SHARP, W. and ORFINGER, M., Senior Judge, concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

KLARICH v. STATE
(Apr 23, 1999)