Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
We agree with the Supreme Court that the determination under review, which revoked a previously-issued special use permit due to noncompliance with the stated conditions, was supported by substantial evidence, and was neither arbitrary nor capricious ( see generally, Matter of Buitenkant v. Robohm, 122 A.D.2d 791).
The petitioners' remaining contentions are without merit.
Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Joy and Krausman, JJ., concur.