Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

NICHOLAS TARZIA v. GREAT ATLANTIC AND PACIFIC TEA COMPANY ET AL.

The third party defendant Samuel Heyman's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 52 Conn. App. 136 (AC 16676), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court properly enforce the twenty day time limit of General Statutes § 52-102a for asserting a claim against an impleaded party?

"2. Did the Appellate Court properly hold that the trial court abused its discretion by refusing to allow an untimely `assertion of claim' to be `amended' into a negligence complaint after the jury had been selected?"

CALLAHAN, C.J., and McDONALD, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16099.

Michael T. Bologna, in support of the petition.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

TARZIA v. GREAT ATLANTIC AND PACIFIC TEA COMPANY
(May 3, 1999)