AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

In the Matter of JASON HUNTLEY, Appellant, v. GLENN GOORD et al., Respondents.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the petitioner's contention, the inmate misbehavior report issued by the New York State Department of Correctional Services was sufficiently detailed to inform him of the specific charges against him and enable him to prepare a defense to the charges against him ( see, Matter of Torres v. Coombe, 234 A.D.2d 710). Similarly, the petitioner failed to demonstrate that he was prejudiced as a result of the failure by one of the correction officers to sign the misbehavior report ( see, Matter of Serra v. Selsky, 223 A.D.2d 845; Matter of Smith v. Walker, 209 A.D.2d 799; Matter of Jimenez v. Coughlin, 206 A.D.2d 769; Matter of Smythe v. McClellan, 226 A.D.2d 840).

By failing to raise the issue at a time when the alleged error could have been corrected, the petitioner waived any claim that he was prejudiced because the Hearing Officer did not personally confirm that one of his witnesses refused to testify ( see, Matter of Alstranner v. Selsky, 238 A.D.2d 658; Matter of Cowart v. Coughlin, 194 A.D.2d 1036; Matter of Dotson v. Coughlin, 191 A.D.2d 912).

The petitioner's remaining contention is without merit.

S. Miller, J. P., Sullivan, Friedmann and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF HUNTLEY v. GOORD
(May 3, 1999)