Citation Codes Equivalent Citations citation codes See more information ... Smart Summary Please sign up to generate summary. NEW HAMPSHIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. VARDA, INC., et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants. (And a Third-Party Action.) Plaintiff's motion to quash was properly denied, since the information sought by defendants' subpoena duces tecum was not "`utterly irrelevant to any proper inquiry'" (Ayubo v. Eastman Kodak Co., 158 A.D.2d 641, 642; Pagan v. City of New York, 180 A.D.2d 545). We have considered plaintiff's additional arguments and find them unavailing. Concur — Tom, J. P., Wallach, Lerner and Rubin, JJ.