AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent v. KARL McCALLA, Appellant

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant was convicted of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree (Penal Law § 220.18) and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law § 220.16) after police recovered a quantity of cocaine thrown by defendant from his motor vehicle during a high speed chase.

The sole argument of defendant on appeal is that County Court erred in denying his request for a missing witness charge with respect to a police officer who did not testify. Although defendant met his initial burden of demonstrating his entitlement to the charge (see, People v. Kitching, 78 N.Y.2d 532, 536-537; People v. Gonzalez, 68 N.Y.2d 424, 427-428), the court properly refused to give the requested charge on the ground that the testimony of that police officer would have been cumulative to other evidence (see, People v. Macana, 84 N.Y.2d 173, 180; People v. Ortiz, 83 N.Y.2d 989; People v. Maddox, 256 A.D.2d 1066). Three other officers who actively participated in the chase and defendant's apprehension testified at trial, and the court received in evidence the written admission of defendant that he threw the cocaine from the window of his vehicle during the course of the high speed chase.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. McCALLA
(May 7, 1999)