Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

LEO SALTERS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

We deny appellant's motion for rehearing. We withdraw this court's opinion issued on January 27, 1999, and substitute the following:

We affirm appellant's conviction for strong armed robbery. We also affirm appellant's sentence as a violent career criminal pursuant to section 775.084(c), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1996).See State v. Johnson, 616 So.2d 1, 2 (Fla. 1993);Scott v. State, 721 So.2d 1245 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). We hold that appellant's opportunity to challenge his sentence, based upon the constitutionality of the statute, ended on October 1, 1996. Consequently, appellant lacked standing to challenge this issue, since his offenses occurred on April 27, 1997. "Once reenacted as a portion of the Florida Statutes, a chapter law is no longer subject to challenge on the grounds that it violates the single subject requirement of Article III."Scott, 721 So.2d at 1246 (citing Johnson, 616 So. at 2).

We recognize and certify to the Supreme Court that our holding, as to the window of opportunity to challenge the statute, conflicts with Thompson v. State, 708 So.2d 315 (Fla. 2d DCA), rev. granted, 717 So.2d 538 (Fla. 1998).

AFFIRMED.

STONE, C.J., DELL and STEVENSON, JJ. concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SALTERS v. STATE
(May 5, 1999)