AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CHRISTOPHER NENNI, Appellant.

Case held, decision reserved and matter remitted to Orleans County Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: County Court erred in denying defendant's suppression motion without conducting a hearing. Defendant's omnibus motion, which was argued before a different Judge, contained sworn statements that the evidence seized should be suppressed because the police lacked probable cause to stop the vehicle in which he was a passenger. The People denied defendant's allegations and indicated that they were prepared to proceed with a hearing ( see, CPL 710.60, [4]; People v. Youngblood, 210 A.D.2d 948). The Judge before whom the motion was argued orally granted defendant's request for a hearing

Appeal from Judgment of Orleans County Court, Hannigan, J. — Robbery, 2nd Degree.

and thus his decision constitutes the law of the case ( see, People v. Broome, 151 A.D.2d 995; People v. Johnson, 131 A.D.2d 696, 697, lv denied 70 N.Y.2d 713). In any event, the successor Judge, who was not present for oral argument, was precluded from deciding the motion ( see, Judiciary Law § 21; People v. Cameron, 194 A.D.2d 438; People v. Hooper, 22 A.D.2d 1006). Furthermore, the court erred in relying on the Grand Jury minutes in determining that a hearing was not necessary ( see, People v. Letts, 156 A.D.2d 868, 869). We therefore hold the case, reserve decision and remit the matter to Orleans County Court for a suppression hearing.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. NENNI
(May 7, 1999)