Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Howard S. Ross v. Loretta Ferrell, et al.

THOMPSON, Judge

AFFIRMED. NO OPINION.

See Rule 53(a)(1) and (a)(2)(E), Ala.R.App.P.; Boykin v. Drake, 699 So.2d 233 (Ala.Civ.App. 1997); and Legal Systems, Inc. v. Hoover, 619 So.2d 930 (Ala.Civ.App. 1993).

The Supreme Court of Alabama transferred the appeal to this court, pursuant to § 12-2-7, Ala. Code 1975.

Robertson, P.J., and Yates and Monroe, JJ., concur.

Crawley, J., dissents.

CRAWLEY, Judge, dissenting.

I dissent. Jones Ferrell did not redeem the property merely by making a tender of the redemption price plus 10% interest. Ross's refusal to accept Ferrell's tender merely excused the requirement of tender contained in § 6-5-253, Ala. Code 1975, a condition precedent to the statutory right of redemption. See Hudson v. Morton, 231 Ala. 392, 165 So. 227 (1936). Ferrell was still required to file a complaint to redeem the property and to do so within one year of the sheriff's sale. See § 6-5-248, Ala. Code 1975. He did not do so. Accordingly, Ross still has an interest in the property.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ROSS v. FERRELL
(May 7, 1999)