Petitioner, a prison inmate, was found guilty of disobeying a direct order in violation of a prison disciplinary rule. According to the misbehavior report, petitioner became argumentative about how tight his handcuffs had been applied and refused repeated orders to stop talking and using abusive language. In our view, the detailed misbehavior report, authored by the correction officer who issued the direct orders, constitutes substantial evidence to support the finding of guilt ( see, Matter of Flowers v. Barkley, 244 A.D.2d 682, 683). Irrespective of whether petitioner's handcuffs were applied according to Department of Correctional Services directives, he nevertheless was required to comply with direct orders given by the correction officer ( see, Matter of Rivera v. Smith, 63 N.Y.2d 501, 515-516; Matter of Moncrieffe v. Bennett, 251 A.D.2d 925). Petitioner's remaining contentions, to the extent that they are properly before this Court, have been reviewed and found to be without merit.
Petitioner was also charged with, but found not guilty of, interference with an employee and harassment.
Cardona, P. J., Crew III, Yesawich Jr., Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur.
Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.