AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent v. JOSEPH SAIN, Appellant

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The determination as to whether to allow a defendant to withdraw a previously-entered plea of guilty rests within the sound discretion of the sentencing court. Only in rare instances will a defendant be entitled to an evidentiary hearing upon a motion to withdraw a plea of guilty ( see, CPL 220.60; People v. Frederick, 45 N.Y.2d 520, 524; People v. Tinsley, 35 N.Y.2d 926, 927; People v. Santana, 176 A.D.2d 360). The County Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the defendant's motion to withdraw his plea without conducting a hearing.

The defendant's contention that the indictment was jurisdictionally defective because the Grand Jury which heard the case voted an indictment after its term had expired is based on matters which are dehors the record.

Mangano, P. J., Santucci, Krausman, Florio and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. SAIN
(May 10, 1999)